首页> 外文OA文献 >Gender Mainstreaming Critiques: Signposts or Dead Ends?
【2h】

Gender Mainstreaming Critiques: Signposts or Dead Ends?

机译:性别主流化评论:路标还是死胡同?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

An enduring legacy of the Beijing conference, gender mainstreaming has been widely implemented and widely critiqued since the 1990s. But the basis of these critiques has changed over time: this article charts a typology of critique approaches. It shows how the central problem is diagnosed variously as the loss of the political dimensions of gender in the course of mainstreaming; or technical shortcomings; or the gendered nature of organisations as the causes of technical failure. For others, the problem has been the failure to scrutinise the connection between gender mainstreaming and changes in gender relations in women's real lives. More recently, another group asserts that the trajectory of gender mainstreaming is simply part of the much broader logic of neoliberal governance. Understanding the technologies of power that shape a feminist practice suitable for the governance institutions into which it is inserted can help guide future feminist engagement.
机译:自从1990年代以来,性别平等主流化一直是北京会议的长期遗产,已经得到广泛实施和批评。但是,这些批评的基础已经随着时间而改变:本文列出了批评方法的类型。它显示了如何在主流化过程中将性别问题的政治层面丧失作为各种诊断的中心问题;或技术缺陷;或组织的性别特征成为技术失败的原因。对于另一些人来说,问题在于未能仔细研究性别主流化与妇女现实生活中性别关系变化之间的联系。最近,另一个团体断言,将性别观点纳入主流的轨迹只是新自由主义治理的更广泛逻辑的一部分。了解形成适合其所处治理机构的女性主义实践的权力技术,可以帮助指导未来的女性主义参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号